The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?
Фото: Sergey Elagin / Global Look Press
，更多细节参见safew官方版本下载
更多详细新闻请浏览新京报网 www.bjnews.com.cn，推荐阅读heLLoword翻译官方下载获取更多信息
「我以前是航海員，我不想繼續待在船上，但想做類似的工作。我覺得這份工作與我的技能相當契合。」，详情可参考搜狗输入法下载